inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

Welcome to David Cochran's Pages

Faith, Love, and Public Influence

Tocqueville recognized, with acute insight, a great deal of the genius of Christianity in America. Writing in the 1830s …

“[I]n America religion has, as it were, laid down its own limits. Religious institutions have remained wholly distinct from political institutions, so that former laws have been easily changed while former belief has remained unshaken. Christianity has therefore retained a strong hold on the public mind in America …The Americans, having admitted the principal doctrines of the Christian religion without inquiry, are obliged to accept in like manner a great number of moral truths originating in and connected with it.” Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, vol. 2 (New York: Vintage, 1990) 6.

“A strong hold on the public mind,” “a great number of moral truths,” “former belief has remained unshaken …”

Obviously, things have changed a bit since when Tocqueville wrote. Just as obviously, American Christianity bears as much a share of the blame as does American anti-Christianity.

For example, something is badly broken with the way we practice our faith when one of our most vocal voices of contemporary American atheism, Sam Harris, finds that the most hate-filled attacks against him come from Bible-quoting (so-called) Christians. Thus, he writes:

“Thousands of people have written to tell me that I am wrong not to believe in God. The most hostile of these communications have come from Christians. This is ironic, as Christians generally imagine that no faith imparts the virtues of love and forgiveness more effectively than their own. The truth is that many who claim to be transformed by Christ’s love are deeply, even murderously, intolerant of criticism. While we may want to ascribe this to human nature, it is clear that such hatred draws considerable support from the Bible. How do I know this? The most disturbed of my correspondents always cite chapter and verse.”

If our faith is what we say it is, hatred has no place in it. Hatred is grounded in fear, and we know that there is no fear in true faith. Likewise, there is no need to grasp for power. No need to dominate or control others. We are already grounded on The Rock. What more do we need?

May we rediscover our faith afresh, recover our confidence, and regain the influence we could wield if we dealt with our neighbors — including our unbelieving neighbors — as we should.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Christian Witness in the American Republic

We don’t have a Christian nation. We do, however, have a nation that has benefited from the public witness of Christianity.

Robert Fogel, Nobel Prize winning economist and director of the Center for Population Economics at the University of Chicago, has recently written:

It is not possible to deal with the future of egalitarianism in America without considering the role of religious movements, particularly … enthusiastic religion.
Robert Fogel, 2002*

Alexis de Tocqueville, whose study of American culture is still highly respected among secular academics today, cautioned his French countrymen:

[There are those] who look forward to a republican form of government as a tranquil and lasting state … and who sincerely desire to prepare men to be free. When these men attack religious opinions, they obey the dictates of their passions and not of their interests.
Alexis de Tocqueville, 1835**

And here is Fannie Lou Hamer, civil rights activist, speaking to a group of northern students who came to Mississippi, in 1964, to help the civil rights cause:

Don’t talk to me about atheism. If God wants to start a movement then hooray for God.
Fannie Lou Hamer, 1964***

*Robert W. Fogel, The Fourth Great Awakening and The Future of Egalitarianism (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2000) 6.

**Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, vol. 1 (New York: Vintage, 1990) 307.

***Quoted in David L. Chappell, A Stone of Hope: Prophetic Religion and the Death of Jim Crow (Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 2004) 71.

If Only the Serpent Had Been Forbidden

What a beautifully twisted quip I just ran across. From Mark Twain:

It was not that Adam ate the apple for the apple’s sake, but because it was forbidden. It would have been better for us — oh infinitely better for us — if the serpent had been forbidden.
– Mark Twain’s Notebook

This and others available here.